Friday, 4 January 2013

Hayley Atwell Not Returning for Captain America: The Winter Soldier

hayley-atwell-captain-america-the-winter-soldier

While we?re still awaiting casting news regarding the female lead for Marvel?s sequel Captain America: The Winter Soldier, we now have some confirmation on who won?t be in the movie.? Hayley Atwell, who played the female lead opposite Chris Evans in The First Avenger, previously played coy when asked about her involvement in the follow-up.? We learned in The Avengers that Peggy Carter is still alive in the present day, and it?s assumed that we?ll be getting at least a few flashbacks to Cap?s 1940s days in the sequel The Winter Soldier, so it seemed feasible for her to make an appearance.? Alas, it appears that Atwell will not, in fact, be popping up in the follow-up.? Hit the jump for more.

hayley-atwell-captain-america-2-sequelWhen asked about her involvement in The Winter Soldier this past September, Atwell responded, ?I?m not allowed to say yet.?? Many took this as a semi-confirmation that she would be showing up in the sequel, but it looks like she may have just been waiting to see how the final script would shake out.? During an interview with TimeOut (via CBM), the outlet reveals her non-involement with the film:

?She wont, she confirms, be back for the [Captain America] sequel.?

The search continues for the film?s female lead, and as early as last August reports started to surface regarding contenders for the role (which is likely that of Peggy?s younger sister, Sharon Carter).? Names like Felicity Jones, Anna Kendrick, Allison Brie, and Mary Elizabeth Winstead have been thrown around, but we have yet to hear any sort of confirmation.? Expect to hear more details soon, though, as directors Anthony and Joe Russo are gearing up to start filming the sequel in March.? Captain America: The Winter Soldier opens on April 4, 2014.

captain-america-2-the-winter-soldier-logo

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1926573/news/1926573/

stacy keibler stacy keibler all star game oscar red carpet daytona 500 start time ryan zimmerman oscars red carpet

Thursday, 3 January 2013

business accounting questions - StudentOfFortune.com

1. Which of the following is NOT a step in the decision making? process?

a. Explore workable alternatives
b. Determine relevant cost? and revenue data
c. Consider appropriate non-financial factors
d. make a? decision

2. Which of the following is NOT a consideration when? determining whether to continue making a part or buy that part?

a. Timing? of the cash receipts and expenditures
b. Opportunity cost
c. Impact on? employees
d. Sunk cost

3. Contribution margin is calculated by? deducting:

a. variable costs from revenue
b. variable costs and? controllable fixed costs from revenue
c. variable costs and? common costs from revenue
d. fixed costs from revenue

4. A segment of? a business probably should be discontinued if:

a. its common costs exceed? its contribution margin
b. its contribution margin exceeds its controllable? fixed costs
c. it cannot produce a contribution margin
d. it has a net? loss

5. When direct costing is used, cost of goods sold? reflects:

a. both variable and fixed manufacturing costs
b. variable? manufacturing costs and variable selling and administrative expenses
c.? variable manufacturing costs only
d. fixed manufacturing costs only

6.? On an income statement prepared with a direct costing approach, the excess of? sales over the cost of goods sold, based on variable costs only, is referred to? as the:

a. marginal gross profit on sales
b. manufacturing? margin
c. marginal income on sales
d. contribution margin

7. Fixed? manufacturing costs are written off as current expenses of the period in which? they occurred when using ______ costing.

a. direct
b. standard
c.? absorption
d. differential

8. Which inventory costing system is NOT? acceptable for financial reporting purposes?

a. Absorption costing
b.? Direct costing
c. Standard costing
d. Variable costing

9. Which of? the following would NOT be relevant to a decision about whether to continue? making a part or whether to buy it from an outside supplier?

a.? Alternative uses for the plant where the part was produced if the part is? purchased
b. A fee previously spent for design of the part
c. The variable? costs of making the part
d. The number of additional employees needed to make? the part

10. A company has sales of $100,000, ending finished goods? inventory of $9,000, variable manufacturing costs of $50,000, and fixed? manufacturing costs of $28,000 for the year. Assuming the company uses direct? costing, the manufacturing margin for the year is:

a. $22,000
b.? $31,000
c. $59,000
d. $13,000

11. A segment of a business reported? a contribution margin of 436,000 and controllable fixed costs of 12,000. If the? segment had been eliminated, the company-wide net income would have? been:

A. $12,000 higher
b. $24,000 lower
c. $36,000 lower
d.? $24,000 higher

12. If a decision must be made to close a warehouse,? non-refundable prepaid rent on the warehouse is a(n) ________ cost.

a.? opportunity
b. common
c. sunk
d. variable

13. When the balance? in ending finished goods inventory increases, net income under absorption costing? is:

a. lower than under direct costing
b. higher than under direct? costing
c. the same under direct costing
d. unaffected by the? increase

14. Which of the following is the first step in the? decision-making process?

A Evaluate the cost and revenue data
b.? Identify workable alternatives
c. Define the problem
d. Consider? appropriate non financial factors

15. Which of the following is NOT a? consideration regarding a special order?

a. If the company has sufficient? capacity
b. If the special order jeopardized sales to the existing? customers
c. Federal laws regarding the price
d. Whether employees morale? would be affected.

16. Which of the following cost amounts can be found? in a firm?s accounting records?

a. Opportunity costs
b.? Differential costs
c. Incremental costs
d. Sunk costs

17. Costs? that are not directly traceable to a specific segment of a business are called? _____costs.

a. sunk
b. common
c. fixed
d. incremental

18.? Which of the following is NOT true of the direct costing procedure?

a.? Variable and fixed costs are considered as part of the cost of goods? manufactured
b. The cost of goods sold, based solely on variable costs, is? subtracted from net sales to arrive at the manufacturing margin.
c. Variable? selling expenses are deducted from the manufacturing margin
d. Variable? administrative expenses are deducted from the manufactur

Read more: 1. Which of the following is NOT a step in the decision making - JustAnswer http://www.justanswer.com/homework/5fdej-1-following-not-step-decision-making.html#ixzz2GpedXlqc

Source: http://www.studentoffortune.com/question/2028675/business-accounting-questions

Beady Eye david bowie Eric Idle rory mcilroy Fatboy Slim Rio de Janeiro Shark Week

QPR ends 30-year slump

By ROB HARRIS

AP Sports Writer

Associated Press Sports

updated 6:47 p.m. ET Jan. 2, 2013

LONDON (AP) -Shaun Wright-Phillips condemned former club Chelsea to a surprise 1-0 loss in the Premier League on Wednesday and gave bottom-place Queens Park Rangers its first victory at Stamford Bridge in 30 years.

Wright-Phillips struck the ball into the bottom corner of the net in the 78th minute to halt Chelsea's run of four successive wins and leave its west London rival in fourth place.

"We were tired and weren't precise," Chelsea manager Rafa Benitez said. "We made a mistake and gave them their chance."

Both teams were playing in the second tier when QPR last won at its west London rival, in April 1983.

"I can't remember many better wins than this one, with Chelsea flying at the moment," QPR manager Harry Redknapp said.

This victory could help prevent QPR from dropping out of the Premier League after two seasons. Redknapp's side is still in a perilous position at the bottom but now only behind Reading on goal difference.

Not only was this QPR's first away win of the season but also the team's first on the road since November 2011 - when Neil Warnock was in charge, two managerial appointments ago.

"They've set the standard what they've got to do if we are going to get out of this mess," Redknapp said.

The triumph came against a Chelsea side that had been revitalized under Benitez but is now 14 points behind leader Manchester United after the team's fourth loss of the season, albeit with a game in hand.

Despite Chelsea only drawing 0-0 at QPR earlier in the season when Roberto Di Matteo was still in charge, Benitez used the game to rotate the squad, making five changes from the side that beat Everton on Sunday.

"I don't regret the changes because we can't carry on with the same players in every game," Benitez said. "If you're playing a team at the bottom of the table at home, you have to trust your players and I trust them."

Midfielder Marko Marin started despite barely 20 minutes of topflight experience in England, and he was fortunate to avoid being sent off after just four minutes when he launched a studs-up challenge over the ball and into Stephane Mbia's shin.

Benitez didn't use this game to carry out his plan to rest striker Fernando Torres, who has started every league match this season.

Despite rediscovering his scoring touch since Benitez arrived in November, Torres went into the QPR game without finding the net in the past two games after hitting seven goals in the previous six matches.

And the Spain forward rarely looked like breaching Julio Cesar's goal on Wednesday - despite knowing that Demba Ba is soon due to arrive from Newcastle to provide competition up front.

There was a tame low shot in the 39th minute that Cesar easily collected on a frustrating for Torres in which he struggled to find space.

Throughout the first half, Chelsea struggled to break down its resilient visitors, with David Luiz's scuffed shot flying over, Oscar's shot blocked by Cesar's legs and Victor Moses firing over.

"Our 'keeper was different class tonight," Redknapp said. "He gave us the feeling he was never going to get beat."

But the intensity from Chelsea stepped up immediately at the start of the second half.

An inviting cross from Marin was poked wide by Moses, Branislav Ivanovic headed over from a corner, and Torres was denied with a first-time strike from point-blank range.

To inject more creativity, Eden Hazard took Marin's place on the hour, but QPR was creating moments of danger.

Jamie Mackie's run on goal was snuffed out by Cahill, before Shaun Derry's header at far post from a corner was collected by goalkeeper Ross Turnbull.

Moses came close when a shot spun over from distance and Frank Lampard had a goal ruled out for offside. But it was QPR which took the lead after Chelsea had failed to properly clear a corner, and Adel Taarabt teed up Wright-Phillips for the winner.

"If we work hard for the rest of the season we'll give ourselves a chance," Redknapp said.

? 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


advertisement

More news
QPR ends 30-year slump

Shaun Wright-Phillips condemned former club Chelsea to a surprise 1-0 loss in the Premier League on Wednesday and gave bottom-place Queens Park Rangers its first victory at Stamford Bridge in 30 years.

Transfer spec? Start with Sneijder

CFT: January is here, and that means the transfer speculation and scuttlebutt that was on low simmer through the last weeks of 2012 will now be on full boil for the first month of 2013.

Source: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/47222163/ns/sports-soccer/

Natina Reed Sandy Hurricane flight tracker Marina Krim Justin Bieber cancer lil wayne Mockingbird Lane

Wednesday, 2 January 2013

Constructivism and Technology | Mathematics and Education

Foundations of Constructivism in Education

Constructivism, on the other hand, is led by the ideas of Jean Piaget and his theories of the four childhood stages of development.? The theories of Constructivism are founded on the belief that ?the child, at first directly assimilating the external environment to his own activity, later, in order to extend this assimilation, forms an increasing number of schemata which are both more mobile and better able to intercoordinate? (Piaget, 1955).? Teachers and educators with the constructivists? perspective believe more in learning by doing.? If a child is able to experiment for himself, the learning will be more profound.? The main argument is that learners actively construct their own knowledge based on their own experiences.?

?Current Trends of Constructivism in Educational Technology

When implementing educational technology, educators and teachers are gearing toward more of a Constructivist approach. Today, there are many supporters of this, especially educators who provide a convincing argument.? There is a switch in focus of attention from the design of educational technology to an interactive problem-based environment in which the student assumes the key.? With this profile in place, the learning task can be tailored to the student?s capabilities rather than the student having to fit in with the educational technology designer?s generalized understanding of how learning should take place.? The creation of these rich learning environments will also have to ensure that texts, reference sources, multimedia and communication facilities are fully integrated.?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Source: http://love4mathed.com/2013/01/constructivism-and-technology/

mlk mlk school closures being human being human chicago news chicago news

In Case There Was Still Any Doubt, Here's the Top Ten Reasons We Know the Earth Is Round

At this point it's hard to find a skeptic who would raise an eyebrow at the notion that our planet is round. But every family has that one uncle or cousin who's so caught up in conspiracy theories they'll question anything. And if you happen to find yourself in a tedious argument defending the spherical nature of the Earth, Minute Physics has put together a useful top ten list of irrefutable facts proving our home is indeed round. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/k-BdporwAyY/in-case-there-was-still-any-doubt-heres-the-top-ten-reasons-we-know-the-earth-is-round

brandy michael pineda charles taylor bruins boston bruins carl crawford mad cow disease

Biden May Be the Most Influential Vice President Ever

Barack Obama just can?t get enough out of Joe Biden these days. And anybody who?s been following Biden?s steady ascent in stature over the last several years -- from gaffe-happy presidential contender to one of the most powerful vice presidents in U.S. history? -- couldn?t be less surprised.

Perhaps the only surprise at all is that, in contrast to a year ago,? it took Biden quite this long to become the president?s point man on the latest round of fiscal talks. The exact reason for the delay is not clear. Perhaps it is that, only a week and a half ago, Obama had called on his vice president to lead a commission to expedite recommendations on a truly serious national issue, gun violence (as opposed to the present trumped-up issue, fiscal reform, which requires only the smidgeon of political courage necessary to depart from? ideological rigidities). Maybe Obama wanted to keep his veep?s powder dry for that.

Or maybe it is just that, in the awkward pattern of political dance partnerships that have emerged over the last couple of years, whenever Barack Obama and Speaker John Boehner fail to execute ? as they did after the ?Plan B? debacle -- it?s Biden and his old Senate colleague, Mitch McConnell, who step into the spotlight. The Biden-McConnell duo didn?t cut it during last year?s cliffhanger over the debt limit, of course. But in a sign of just how important a figure the vice president has become in Washington, Biden?s absence until now has been one reason that Republicans doubted Obama?s seriousness about cutting a deal, my colleague Chris Frates reported last week.

As the inevitable brinksmanship plays out, it?s useful to step back and look at just how central a role Biden has played throughout Obama?s presidency.

Over the past four years Biden has insinuated himself into the White House, while seeming hardly to try, in a way that no other vice president in memory has done. He and Obama, both consummate pragmatists though they tend to be liberal in outlook, have achieved something close to a mind meld across a whole range of issues, including foreign policy, the economy, and political strategy. Biden said it outright in his speech during the presidential campaign: ?I literally get to be the last guy in the room with the president. That?s our arrangement.? That?s no small thing in a town where power is often measured in minutes of presidential face time.

It wasn?t long ago that Biden?s predecessor, Dick Cheney, was seen as the gold -- some might say sulfurous -- standard in vice presidential power. Biden himself, ironically enough, once described Cheney as ?probably the most dangerous vice president we?ve had? because of what many observers saw as Cheney?s undue influence over George W. Bush.?

But in terms of the sheer number of issues Biden has influenced in a short time, the current vice president is bidding to surpass even Cheney. Fiscal issues and guns are only a small sampling of this vice president?s portfolio. Back in 2010 it was Biden?s office that, in the main, orchestrated the handover to the Iraqis. It is Biden?s view of Afghanistan that has, bit by bit, come to dominate thinking inside the 2014 withdrawal plan. On financial reform it was Biden who prodded an indecisive Obama to embrace, at long last, Paul Volcker?s idea of barring banks from risky trading, according to Austan Goolsbee, formerly the head of Obama?s Council of Economic Advisers. The VP also tilted the discussion in favor of a bailout of the Big Three auto companies, according to Jared Bernstein, Biden?s former economic adviser. ?I think he made a difference in president?s thinking," Bernstein said. "He understood the importance of the auto companies to their communities, and throughout the country.?

In an interview in the fall of 2010, Biden could hardly contain his enthusiasm for his partnership with Obama. The phrase ?Barack and I ? ? fell from his lips naturally, with no hint of diffidence. He told me then that to his continuing surprise Obama has continued to ?turn over big chunks? of policy to him to handle, whether it?s Iraq, middle-class issues, overseeing the recovery act.? At an early meeting, ?all of sudden Obama stopped. He said, ?Joe will do Iraq. Joe knows more about Iraq than anyone.?. The [Economic] Recovery Act, he just handed it over? to Biden, according to a senior administration official who attended the meetings and would talk about internal discussions only on condition of anonymity.

All of this power makes for quite an irony. Until his ascent to veep, Joe Biden was largely known as an amiable guy with a brilliant smile and a rather big mouth in which he frequently inserted his foot. And it?s not as if anyone could have expected that he?d be much more impressive as vice president. The vice presidency is a job that has tried to be taken seriously throughout U.S. history?and usually failed. John Adams, the nation?s first vice president, bitterly derided his job as ?the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived.?? Like Adams, it was often men who had tasted real power who had the most disdain for the job. John Nance Garner, a former House speaker and FDR?s equally slighted No. 2, declared the job wasn?t ?worth a bucket of warm spit? (it?s believed he used an even saltier term). In modern times the vice presidency began to grow in stature, especially as the hair-trigger calculus of the Cold War required presidents to keep their putative replacements informed. But the job remained for the most part a funeral-attending, snooze-inducing post, barren of almost all constitutional duties.

The previous two vice presidents, Cheney and his predecessor, Al Gore, significantly changed that power dynamic. But on Biden?s watch the ?OVP??Office of the Vice President-- has become something even more: almost a conjoined twin to the presidency, organically linked and indivisible from the Oval Office. Cheney succeeded for a time by creating a kind of shadow presidency, yet there?s nothing shadowy about Biden. Indeed Biden remains, in many respects, the anti-Cheney.

Yet in two critical respects the Delaware Democrat?and the Wyoming Republican do resemble each other. Both are known to be confident in pushing their views, and both became masters of the Washington insider game. Whereas John Adams was not invited to participate in meetings of George Washington?s Cabinet, Biden handles so many issues that when, say, the national security team leaves the Oval Office, he is often left alone chatting with Obama because he needs to be part of the discussion when the economic team arrives to brief the president. He will also often sit down with Obama in the residence before an important National Security Council meeting.?

Now, if Barack Obama does leave a lasting legacy on gun violence that comes out of the terrible tragedy in Newtown, Conn., Biden will be a big part of it. And if anything like an agreement is reached on fiscal issues, Biden is likely to be part of? that as well. His long Senate tenure, and the many relationships he developed across the aisle, are once again proving crucial.? As I reported in the fall of 2010, shortly before the looming congressional election that gave the Republicans?and the Tea Party?the House, no one has more experience working with the other party, reaching across the aisle, and that talent may be critical to just keeping the government going in the coming months. ?He can sit down in foreign policy or other issues and find a common interest and drive the ideas forward. Look at what he did with Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond? in passing the chemical weapons treaty and crime bills, respectively, in the ?90s, his former chief of staff (and later successor), Ted Kaufman, noted back then. ?I mean, Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond! You don?t get more conservative than that.?

Actually, you do, as the current breed of Republicans has demonstrated in this era. But if anyone can talk to Mitch McConnell, it?s Joe Biden. Whose stock is still rising steadily.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/biden-may-most-influential-vice-president-ever-133153208--politics.html

boxing news Coptic Christian saturday night live julio cesar chavez jr Topless Kate university of texas UT Austin

Tuesday, 1 January 2013

Omega-3s may not protect against faulty heart rhythm

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Sorry, Charlie, but fish oil supplements did not prevent atrial fibrillation in patients who had already experienced episodes of the heart rhythm malfunction, a new clinical trial has found.

The study, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, adds to a growing pool of disappointing evidence regarding the protective effects of omega-3 fatty acids on heart health.

"The results for atrial fibrillation are important negative findings, answering key clinical and research questions," said Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, an omega-3 expert at the Harvard School of Public Health, who was not involved in the current study.

The new research, combined with other trials, "indicates that short-term fish oil use is unlikely to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation," he said.

But if the supplements don't prevent heart rhythm problems, they don't appear to be dangerous, either. "In all these studies, fish oil was safe and well-tolerated, with no evidence for increased bleeding," Mozaffarian told Reuters Health.

Atrial fibrillation, in which the heart's upper chambers beat out of step with those below, affects nearly one in 10 Americans in their 80s. The condition is linked to potentially life-threatening strokes and heart failure.

Although doctors prescribe certain medications to treat the condition, none to date has proven particularly effective. As a result, most drug treatment focuses on preventing strokes by administering blood thinners to dissolve clots caused by the fibrillation.

Some evidence suggests that omega-3 fatty acids, found in oily fish like sardines and tuna, might reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation, although exactly how they would produce their effect is not clear.

A study published earlier this year in Circulation, for example, found that people with the most omega-3s in their blood had a 30 percent lower chance of developing an irregular heart beat than those with the lowest concentrations of the substances (see Reuters Health story of February 1, 2012).

That 30 percent difference would work out to eight fewer cases of atrial fibrillation per 100 people - which would be a meaningful benefit if it could be enjoyed by those with fibrillation or at risk for it, just by consuming more omega 3s.

But the latest study suggests that it probably can't. The trial included 586 men and women with a history of atrial fibrillation who were given a gram a day of fish oil or dummy capsules for a year. Participants also were allowed to take other drugs to control their heart rhythms, as prescribed by their doctors.

At the end of the study period, about 24 percent of the people who took fish oil, and 20 percent of those who did not, had experienced a recurrence of atrial fibrillation - a difference so small, statistically, it was likely due to chance.

The supplements also did not appear to reduce the risk of other cardiovascular ailments - including stroke, heart attack, heart failure - or death from any cause.

The findings on atrial fibrillation echo results from a study led by Mozaffarian published in November, of patients recovering from heart surgery.

Even so, Dr. Alejandro Macchia, a cardiologist at the GESICA Foundation in Buenos Aires, who led the current study and collaborated with Mozaffarian on the previous one, said fish oil may still prove beneficial for heart health, at least in some patients.

"I am not sure the story is over," Dr. Macchia told Reuters Health. "I think we have enough evidence to say that there is no role of (omega-3 fatty acids) for the prevention of atrial fibrillation" in patients with a history of the condition, he said. "However in the context of primary prevention - those people who had never had a previous episode of atrial fibrillation - there is a reasonable room for a well-designed and very large clinical trial."

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/VrTKiY Journal of the American College of Cardiology, online December 19, 2012.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/omega-3s-may-not-protect-against-faulty-heart-152528483.html

Shark Week London 2012 closing ceremony Shark Week 2012 evelyn lozada UFC 150 Caster Semenya Medal Count 2012 Olympics